{{ languageVal }}
- English
-
Legal Services
Fiduciary Services
- AIFM & UCITS Management Company Services
- Accounting, Tax & Agency Services
- Commodity Pool Operator Services
- Company Secretarial & Board Support Services
- Conflict Review & Advisory Services
- Directorship Services
- Facilities Agent Services
- Permanent Office Solutions
- Power of Attorney & Proxy Agent Services
- Private Client Services
- Trustee Services
Fund Services
Regulatory & Compliance
-
Americas and Caribbean
Europe
-
PUT YOUR CAREER INTO GEAR
-
-
Aviation Law Review 2022: Cayman Islands
16 Aug 2022Lexology Transfer Pricing Guide 2023: Luxembourg
15 Aug 2022EDPB's Approach to GDPR Fines
10 Aug 2022
Industry Updates
EU Regulator Warning on Post-Brexit Financial Services EU Access Exemptions
14 Jan 2021
The European Securities and Markets Association ("ESMA") has published a statement on reverse solicitation of clients by third country firms following Brexit and the end of the UK transition period on 31 December 2020.
It has identified what it calls "questionable practices" by firms in this regard, for example, using general clauses or online pop-up "I agree" boxes in terms and conditions requiring clients to agree that services are provided at the exclusive initiative of the client. Notably ESMA highlights recital 111 of MiFID II which states "where a third-country firm solicits clients or potential clients in the Union or promotes or advertises investment services or activities together with ancillary services in the Union, it should not be deemed as a service provided at the own exclusive initiative of the client".
ESMA also reminds firms that when determining what constitutes solicitation, promotion or advertising in the EU, all communication means used (such as press releases; advertising on the internet; brochures; phone calls or face-to-face meetings) should be considered. Also those communications should be examined regardless of the person through whom such communications are issued: whether it is the firm itself, or a person acting on its behalf or with close links to the firm.
ESMA's statement aligns with our previous advice to clients on the narrow scope of this exemption, particularly where it relates to services being provided to retail clients.
Impacted firms will need to consider this statement, together with the general prohibition against holding oneself out as an investment firm without having the necessary authorisation, and
review their practices to ensure that they do not contravene MiFID II requirements.
The Financial Services Regulatory team at Maples Group, Dublin can guide UK (or other third country) firms on the scope of the MiFID regime and various options to consider relating to the provision of investment services to clients and products based in Ireland.
Further Information
If you would like further information, please liaise with the below or your usual Maples Group contact.
Print Ready Version
It has identified what it calls "questionable practices" by firms in this regard, for example, using general clauses or online pop-up "I agree" boxes in terms and conditions requiring clients to agree that services are provided at the exclusive initiative of the client. Notably ESMA highlights recital 111 of MiFID II which states "where a third-country firm solicits clients or potential clients in the Union or promotes or advertises investment services or activities together with ancillary services in the Union, it should not be deemed as a service provided at the own exclusive initiative of the client".
ESMA also reminds firms that when determining what constitutes solicitation, promotion or advertising in the EU, all communication means used (such as press releases; advertising on the internet; brochures; phone calls or face-to-face meetings) should be considered. Also those communications should be examined regardless of the person through whom such communications are issued: whether it is the firm itself, or a person acting on its behalf or with close links to the firm.
ESMA's statement aligns with our previous advice to clients on the narrow scope of this exemption, particularly where it relates to services being provided to retail clients.
Impacted firms will need to consider this statement, together with the general prohibition against holding oneself out as an investment firm without having the necessary authorisation, and
review their practices to ensure that they do not contravene MiFID II requirements.
The Financial Services Regulatory team at Maples Group, Dublin can guide UK (or other third country) firms on the scope of the MiFID regime and various options to consider relating to the provision of investment services to clients and products based in Ireland.
Further Information
If you would like further information, please liaise with the below or your usual Maples Group contact.
Print Ready Version
Related Services
Irish Financial Services Regulatory
Our Financial Services Regulatory group in Ireland comprises of leading lawyers and experienced industry professionals with a wealth of experience in advising clients on regulatory requirements and how to manage regulatory risk within their business. Our highly technical team deliver pragmatic and solutions-focused advice to our clients.
Related Contacts
Related Articles
-
-
Industry Updates
New Mandatory Consideration of ESG Factors for EU Investment Fund Managers
07 Jul 2022
-
-
Industry Updates
MiFID Sustainability Preferences - Putting ESG at the Centre of the Sales Process
30 Jun 2022
-
-
-
Industry Updates
New EU Ban on Selling Investment Funds to Russian or Belarusian Persons
27 Apr 2022
-