- English
-
Legal Services
Fiduciary Services
- AIFM & UCITS Management Company Services
- Accounting, Tax & Agency Services
- Commodity Pool Operator Services
- Company Secretarial & Board Support Services
- Conflict Review & Advisory Services
- Directorship Services
- Facilities Agent Services
- Permanent Office Solutions
- Power of Attorney & Proxy Agent Services
- Private Client Services
- Trustee Services
Fund Services
Regulatory & Compliance
-
Americas and Caribbean
Europe
-
PUT YOUR CAREER INTO GEAR
-
Maples Group Moves to New London Office with a focus on Clients, People and Collaboration
24 Apr 2024Maples Group Sponsors Rugby Club Luxembourg, Fostering Shared Values of Excellence, Teamwork, and Community
23 Apr 2024Maples Group Recognised as Offshore Firm of the Year Including Six Standout Asia Deals of the Year
18 Apr 2024Maples Group Launches UK Liquidations Services
10 Apr 2024 -
ICLG Aviation Law 2024: Cayman Islands
11 Apr 2024
Announcements
Maples Group Advises Vista Del Mar Development Ltd.
08 Apr 2019
Maples Group's legal services team led by partner Mac Imrie and associate Gemma Freeman successfully defend an appeal brought before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the "Privy Council") in Francis and Anor (Appellants) v Vista Del Mar Development Ltd (Respondents) (Cayman Islands).1
The Maples Group acted for long standing client, Vista Del Mar Development Ltd.
The appeal arose in the context of Vista Del Mar Development Limited's successful application for specific performance of an option to repurchase land under a contract to develop a building plot. It concerned the consequences that arise if an option holder delays in exercising its option rights (or its rights under a new bilateral contract arising on the exercise of an option) and the circumstances surrounding any delay.
In affirming the rulings of the Cayman Islands Grand Court and Court of Appeal, the Privy Council confirms the applicable law with respect to the effective exercise of options: (i) an option will only be effectively exercised if exercised in strict conformity with its terms; (ii) where parties have not provided a specified time within which to exercise an option, it must be exercised within a reasonable time (being a question of fact to be determined in light of all the circumstances); and (iii) where an option gives the right to acquire land, its exercise as a matter of law fundamentally changes the relationship between the parties such that the option holder becomes a purchaser and in equity the owner of the property (United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 and Shaw v Foster (1872) LR 5 HL 321).
The ruling also discusses late amendments to pleadings, which are possible where it does not require the Board to make new findings of fact or apply any new principles of law already considered by the local lower courts.
1 https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/jcpc-2017-0074.html
Related Services
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
Related Articles
-
Maples Group Advances AI Strategy with Global Rollout of Harvey AI Partnership
11 Mar 2024
-
Announcements
Maples Group Announces 2024 Global Partner and Of Counsel Promotions
20 Feb 2024
-
Announcements
Maples Group "Top Class" and "Go to Firm" According to 2024 Chambers Global Guide
15 Feb 2024
-
-
Deals
Maples Group Advises Sunac on Landmark US$10.2 Billion Debt Restructuring
21 Nov 2023
-
Announcements
Maples Group Leads the 2024 Legal 500 Caribbean Guide with Most Tier 1 Rankings
13 Nov 2023
-
Announcements
Maples Group Celebrates Strong Ties between Japan and its Multi-Jurisdictional Global Network
26 Oct 2023
-
Announcements
Maples Group Adds Senior Restructuring Lawyer to Dublin Practice
12 Oct 2023