- English
-
Legal Services
Fiduciary Services
- AIFM & UCITS Management Company Services
- Accounting, Tax & Agency Services
- Commodity Pool Operator Services
- Company Secretarial & Board Support Services
- Conflict Review & Advisory Services
- Directorship Services
- Facilities Agent Services
- Permanent Office Solutions
- Power of Attorney & Proxy Agent Services
- Private Client Services
- Trustee Services
Fund Services
Regulatory & Compliance
-
Americas and Caribbean
Europe
-
PUT YOUR CAREER INTO GEAR
-
-
Lexology Transfer Pricing Guide 2023: Luxembourg
15 Aug 2022EDPB's Approach to GDPR Fines
10 Aug 2022
Announcements
Maples Group Advises Vista Del Mar Development Ltd.
08 Apr 2019
Maples Group's legal services team led by partner Mac Imrie and associate Gemma Freeman successfully defend an appeal brought before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the "Privy Council") in Francis and Anor (Appellants) v Vista Del Mar Development Ltd (Respondents) (Cayman Islands).1
The Maples Group acted for long standing client, Vista Del Mar Development Ltd.
The appeal arose in the context of Vista Del Mar Development Limited's successful application for specific performance of an option to repurchase land under a contract to develop a building plot. It concerned the consequences that arise if an option holder delays in exercising its option rights (or its rights under a new bilateral contract arising on the exercise of an option) and the circumstances surrounding any delay.
In affirming the rulings of the Cayman Islands Grand Court and Court of Appeal, the Privy Council confirms the applicable law with respect to the effective exercise of options: (i) an option will only be effectively exercised if exercised in strict conformity with its terms; (ii) where parties have not provided a specified time within which to exercise an option, it must be exercised within a reasonable time (being a question of fact to be determined in light of all the circumstances); and (iii) where an option gives the right to acquire land, its exercise as a matter of law fundamentally changes the relationship between the parties such that the option holder becomes a purchaser and in equity the owner of the property (United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 and Shaw v Foster (1872) LR 5 HL 321).
The ruling also discusses late amendments to pleadings, which are possible where it does not require the Board to make new findings of fact or apply any new principles of law already considered by the local lower courts.
1 https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/jcpc-2017-0074.html
Related Services
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
Related Articles
-
Announcements
Maples Group Wins Three Awards at China Business Law Awards 2022
15 Jun 2022
-
Announcements
Maples Group Wins Nine Finance Dublin Deals of the Year Awards 2022
01 Jun 2022
-
Announcements
Maples Group Announces Partner and Of Counsel Promotions in the Caribbean Region
12 May 2022
-
-
Announcements
Maples Group Announces Partner and Of Counsel Promotions in Europe
08 Mar 2022
-
Announcements
Maples Lawyers Recognised for "Unparalleled Expertise" in 2022 Chambers Global Guide
02 Mar 2022
-
Announcements
Maples Group Wins Multiple Law Firm Awards and Leading Individual Recognitions in Asia
31 Dec 2021
-